Since when is "INFO" a dirty word?

[online]

I cannot enter URLs for the ****** TLD.

I expect that if this bug is not fixed, you may get mail from Afilias asking "what's up?" -- if not sooner from users who wonder why one of the largest registries on the WWW is being "blocked" this way.

:( nmw

[tokenuser]

Why is ****** a dirty word?

Because it, along with **** domains are the most common TLD for spammers on the internet.

Doubt its going to be corrected.

[AriaStar]

Why is ****** a dirty word?

Because it, along with **** domains are the most common TLD for spammers on the internet.

Doubt its going to be corrected.

Token, where did you heard ****** is one of the most common spam extensions? I see **** all the time, but not a whole lot of ******. .cn seems to be more common. (btw, I am an e-mail security analyst, so I'm not going on what I see in my personal mail, but rather what I see coming in our feeds, and we get millions a day.)

[AriaStar]

I cannot enter URLs for the ****** TLD.

I expect that if this bug is not fixed, you may get mail from Afilias asking "what's up?" -- if not sooner from users who wonder why one of the largest registries on the WWW is being "blocked" this way.

:( nmw

huh, interesting. Four posts and three have to do with domains. :)

[tokenuser]

Porn sites are commonly spammed via ******. Thats not something you typically get in email, where they are trying to sell you something via a **** or .cn site.

[xibalba]

huh, interesting. Four posts and three have to do with domains. :)

Look at their profile

Biography:
keyword advertising online marketing domain names domains
Location:
online
Interests:
sex
Occupation:
CEO

Looks a little spamish.

[online]

Why is ****** a dirty word?

Because it, along with **** domains are the most common TLD for spammers on the internet.

Doubt its going to be corrected.

OMG! :O

Hmmm -- do you suggest that I talk about such prejudiced censorship methodologies with Afilias (or perhaps I should post on digg.com?)

I remember like 7 or 8 years ago one of my mails was bounced with the robots response saying it was rejected because it came from the .DE TLD. I thought such ignorance and provincialism was a thing of the past, but I am shocked to learn that apparently it isn't!

I cannot fathom how such BLATANT prejudice is not only allowed but actually propagated as if it were something like "moderation".

*shakes head*

*dunks head in cold water*

*walks away*

:( nmw

[online]

Look at their profile


Looks a little spamish.

cross posted

English, not spamish.

If you do not understand what marketing / advertising is, or if you have problems with people who say they have sex as a hobby, I feel that is *your* problem, not mine.

But thanks for at least being honest and upfront about your reaction -- I feel that's a virtue.

:) nmw

[xibalba]

I don't have a problem. Your profile makes you look like a spammer thats all.

Complaining about ****** sound like you have the problem. Most spam threads I have seen posted on these forums end with it. So why not block it, is their site afterall. They can do what they want.

[online]

I don't have a problem. Your profile makes you look like a spammer thats all.

Complaining about ****** sound like you have the problem. Most spam threads I have seen posted on these forums end with it. So why not block it, is their site afterall. They can do what they want.

Good point -- and I guess you're at least presenting a logical argument: Nobody is being forced to pay attention to morons. :P

[AriaStar]

Porn sites are commonly spammed via ******. Thats not something you typically get in email, where they are trying to sell you something via a **** or .cn site.

If only you had an idea how many messages we get coming in a day to porn sites. :)

[Secret Steve Crumbles]

(btw, I am an e-mail security analyst..)Holy shit, do they just make up job titles now? That's hilarious.

[AriaStar]

Look at their profile


Looks a little spamish.

Agreed.

[AriaStar]

cross posted

English, not spamish.

If you do not understand what marketing / advertising is, or if you have problems with people who say they have sex as a hobby, I feel that is *your* problem, not mine.

But thanks for at least being honest and upfront about your reaction -- I feel that's a virtue.

:) nmw

Uh, we aren't allowed to cross-post the same message in more than one place here.

Hmmm, if you don't start interacting with members in a way that doesn't involve complaining about ******, you're going to keep making yourself look like a spammer. :D

[ericjosepi]

[QUOTE=online;339266]Hmmm -- do you suggest that I talk about such prejudiced censorship methodologies with Afilias (or perhaps I should post on digg.com?)
/QUOTE]

Wah wah censorship wah wah. This is a private message board and as such there are rules that members are expected to follow. Some of the rules involve what we are allowed and not allowed to talk about/post. The mods around here are pretty lenient but they have to enforce the limits. This isn't a public (govvie-run) website so when there are terms that you agree too with your account some of those terms may include censoring certain TLDs.

It happens. If you want a forum that allows for info TLDs then start your own. Or better yet, register a .com TLD and point it to your info site - problem solved.

[online]

Uh, we aren't allowed to cross-post the same message in more than one place here.

By "cross post", I meant that my previous post was made at the same as the other post. If you had used the site search to check your hunch, you would have been able to ascertain that your hunch was wrong.

Hmmm, if you don't start interacting with members in a way that doesn't involve complaining about ******, you're going to keep making yourself look like a spammer. :D

As can be quite easily gleaned from you previous remark, you appear to be somewhat prone to making bad guesses.

To the moderators of this forum:

I will take a break from pushing the issue for today. I strongly suggest that you check with their superiors before causing any more damage to a pretty bad situation -- basically: "if you're in an hole, then stop digging".

I will revisit the thread tomorrow to see if a somewhat more reasonable approach takes hold. I highly recommend that you thoroughly consider the consequences of such a laughable policy as the one you are proposing. I feel you should strongly consider whether there is any reason to aim to address dimwits and noobs as a "target audience". I will leave it at that for the moment, and hope that I do not need to explicate the inanity of the proposed censorship algorithm any more.

Thank you for your consideration.

[online]

better yet, register a .com TLD and point it to your info site - problem solved.

I think your proposed solution to register .COM sites is done by the vast majority of spammers and cyber-criminals alike. For example, if I am not mistaken, then allofmp3 was registered with the .COM registry. Other .COM addresses are also currently under investigation for copyright violations. Indeed, if it were possible to make a correlation between the TLD of a website and the likelihood of fraudulent behavior at that site, then my guess would be that .COM would not fare very well at all. As far as I know, the managers of the .COM registry have also encountered several mismanagement fiascos. Perhaps you should consider whether your argument has a leg to stand on (?)

[tokenuser]

OMG! :O

Hmmm -- do you suggest that I talk about such prejudiced censorship methodologies with Afilias (or perhaps I should post on digg.com?)

I remember like 7 or 8 years ago one of my mails was bounced with the robots response saying it was rejected because it came from the .DE TLD. I thought such ignorance and provincialism was a thing of the past, but I am shocked to learn that apparently it isn't!

I cannot fathom how such BLATANT prejudice is not only allowed but actually propagated as if it were something like "moderation".

*shakes head*

*dunks head in cold water*

*walks away*

:( nmwCensorship? No - proactive moderation of known spam sites.

If you are a representative of Afilias, you might want to send an email to Revision3, until then, please stop trying to moderate by proxy.
Please let me point out a couple of things to you:

3. Be kind to other members by showing respect to their opinions and feelings. Making false claims about a person or company is prohibited. The use of the Revision3 forums is a privilege, not a right. Having a negative attitude, being a snob, and flaming will not be tolerated anywhere.


8. If you have any questions, concerns, or feel as if you were unjustly punished, please PM the moderator involved. Making a public scene of it not only won't help the situation, but will look very bad on your part, as well...possibly resulting in disciplinary action up to and including a ban.

Spam

Spam is NOT tolerated on this board. Spam is categorized by different factors as stated below.

3. Posts
3a. Excessive posting of the same topic is considered spamming.
3b. Excessive bumping of topics is considered spamming.
3c. If possible, editing of the original topic or replying to the original topic should be practiced.
3d. If a topic doesn't receive a reply within a reasonable amount of time, (24 hours), then bumping is allowed.

Example for 3ab.
Spam: Topic: Help my computer blew up. <Posted multiple times.>
Spam: "Anybody?" or "Bump" or etc. <Less than 24 hours after creating the topic.>

Note that all above guidelines apply globally, to posts, profiles, signatures, avatars, pm's, etc. Revision3 reserves the right to categorize anything else that isn't mentioned here as spam, or prohibited content. Failure to follow Spam guidelines, or any other rules listed above, may result in a suspension and/or ban of your account at the discretion of the Revision3 staff.

***We (Revision3) reserve the right to change or alter any guideline, at any given time, with or without notice. Please check back here often to ensure you're up to date with them.***


You can revisit the thread by all means, but play by the rules please.

[comhcinc]

i have an easy solution. i am going to put you on the "ignore list" and i suggest everyone else do the same. that way no one will have to bother about you.

[TheArchAngel]

By "cross post"

To the moderators of this forum:

I will take a break from pushing the issue for today. I strongly suggest that you check with their superiors before causing any more damage to a pretty bad situation -- basically: "if you're in an hole, then stop digging".

I will revisit the thread tomorrow to see if a somewhat more reasonable approach takes hold. I highly recommend that you thoroughly consider the consequences of such a laughable policy as the one you are proposing. I feel you should strongly consider whether there is any reason to aim to address dimwits and noobs as a "target audience". I will leave it at that for the moment, and hope that I do not need to explicate the inanity of the proposed censorship algorithm any more.

Thank you for your consideration.

OK guy you need to stop fussing about this or im pretty sure they will ban or limit your membership. It really isn't that big of a deal, I would really like for you to this tries to be a peaceful place just let if be. This is a tech/news internet network and these forums are asking questions about tech/news or telling the "powers how to make the shows better. One thing it is not is a social networking site, ex. Myspace/Facebook if you want to that i suggest you goto one of these sites im sure Tom will be happy to see your moneymaking face

[tokenuser]

I remember like 7 or 8 years ago one of my mails was bounced with the robots response saying it was rejected because it came from the .DE TLD. I thought such ignorance and provincialism was a thing of the past, but I am shocked to learn that apparently it isn't!BTW - Are you German, or living in the US?

[AriaStar]

By "cross post", I meant that my previous post was made at the same as the other post. If you had used the site search to check your hunch, you would have been able to ascertain that your hunch was wrong.



As can be quite easily gleaned from you previous remark, you appear to be somewhat prone to making bad guesses.

To the moderators of this forum:

I will take a break from pushing the issue for today. I strongly suggest that you check with their superiors before causing any more damage to a pretty bad situation -- basically: "if you're in an hole, then stop digging".

I will revisit the thread tomorrow to see if a somewhat more reasonable approach takes hold. I highly recommend that you thoroughly consider the consequences of such a laughable policy as the one you are proposing. I feel you should strongly consider whether there is any reason to aim to address dimwits and noobs as a "target audience". I will leave it at that for the moment, and hope that I do not need to explicate the inanity of the proposed censorship algorithm any more.

Thank you for your consideration.

Cross-posting refers to posting the same thin in multiple locations. For a newb, you sure seem to think you know my ability to guess. We are tired of dealing with spam around here, seeing it all the time. If the mods here see most spam come from ****** and ****, then they've got every damned right to disallow those domains. It's their job, and the only reason you could have for pushing this is because you are a spammer.

I suggest you take a break from this issue forever. Unless you plan to regularly post ****** domains, all but proving you are a spammer, then this shouldn't be a big deal.

Look, I've got a team over in Moscow I had posting spam messages more or less to get e-mail addresses out there to see what kind of spam messages we could get. I had a bunch of guys spend a couple months sitting there manually joining forums, confirming e-mail addresses, then posting messages with an e-mail address to a feed I use. Forum spammers aren't always bots. They are also people, and I definitely think you are one.

Prove me wrong, drop this issue, and go interact in other areas of the forum.

[AriaStar]

BTW - Are you German, or living in the US?

Because this is public info anyway:

===[ Personal Information Removed: Yes, its public, but no need to post it in a public forum ... - TokenUser ]===



So registered as Connecticut with a .de e-mail. Same info for all the domains he posted, only the registration dates were different.

[tokenuser]

Because this is public info anyway:Thankyou Aria.

I did actually look that up first.

I also looked at his websites submitted to the contest - and noticed that they are not personal websites, but ones that are being squatted on. Personal opinion only (not that of Rev3) is that people that do that are just one step above the spammers, and make it increasingly difficult for legitimate business owners to purchase a meaningful domain name without having to pay extortion to the squatter.

The rules for the competition clearly state "(b) be 13 years of age or older and a legal resident of the United States for the duration of the contest."

I also know that he is posting from a German IP address.

Never trust the contact info on a whois lookup.

[AriaStar]

Thankyou Aria.

I did actually look that up first.

I also looked at his websites submitted to the contest - and noticed that they are not personal websites, but ones that are being squatted on. Personal opinion only (not that of Rev3) is that people that do that are just one step above the spammers, and make it increasingly difficult for legitimate business owners to purchase a meaningful domain name without having to pay extortion to the squatter.

The rules for the competition clearly state "(b) be 13 years of age or older and a legal resident of the United States for the duration of the contest."

I also know that he is posting from a German IP address.

Never trust the contact info on a whois lookup.

Oh I know about not trusting whois info completely. We see it all the time where a phisher buys a similar domain, then registers it with the real company's information. We deal with that all the time.

Damn, squatters, I hate those people. I once had to change a business name because a squatter had the business name I had registered, and I didn't have the time nor money at that point to fight it. Businesses CAN fight squatters, but it's costly and time-consuming.

[online]

Hmmm... -- have the replies here drifted off topic?

It seems to me that there is a great deal of confusion about "spamming" and "squatting" when the original question was whether/why "INFO" is a censored concept and/or top-level domain.

I take it that there will be no "reasonable" explanation of why there is a prejudice that ****** domains might be more prone to spam than .COM names.

Our company maintains offices in both the United States and Europe.

And I was not aware that a contest for "the best domain name" might have anything to do with a website -- I did not submit a website, only the domain.

Am I right to interpret the response here as "please either drop the issue or take the issue elsewhere"? If so, I can do that (but IMHO it doesn't really show a great deal of openness to user participation and/or engagement with issues related to *THIS* website).

Please clarify this, because I would like to clearly know whether I should actually be disappointed or not.

Thanks!

[tokenuser]

1. For the purposes of the competition ...

ARE YOU A US RESIDENT?

Maintaining offices in both countries does not have the same meaning. Trust me ... I know.

2. ****** domain names ...

Today I deleted 3 forum posts linking to porn sites with ****** domain names. The only other post deleted due to spam did have a .com URL ... and it was google.com via the google notebok feature.

The choice to redact the URLs was made by the powers that be some time ago and has been effective at preventing spam - especially where images are involved. Since you are in the SEO game, you would be well aware that having your full URL posted in sites with key words boosts your ratings in the search engines. It sucks to be in the SEO business, but as people try to game the system, this is the sort of response that occurs.

3. Domain Squatting ...

As I said - that is personal opinion. I think that the speculative purchase of domain names for the express purpose of squatting on them until someone else wants them for legitimate business purposes is a low business tactic.

BTW - Topics go off rails in these forums all the time.

[online]

oops -- see below :O

[online]

1. For the purposes of the competition ...

ARE YOU A US RESIDENT?

Maintaining offices in both countries does not have the same meaning. Trust me ... I know.

2. ****** domain names ...

Today I deleted 3 forum posts linking to porn sites with ****** domain names. The only other post deleted due to spam did have a .com URL ... and it was google.com via the google notebok feature.

The choice to redact the URLs was made by the powers that be some time ago and has been effective at preventing spam - especially where images are involved. Since you are in the SEO game, you would be well aware that having your full URL posted in sites with key words boosts your ratings in the search engines. It sucks to be in the SEO business, but as people try to game the system, this is the sort of response that occurs.

3. Domain Squatting ...

As I said - that is personal opinion. I think that the speculative purchase of domain names for the express purpose of squatting on them until someone else wants them for legitimate business purposes is a low business tactic.

BTW - Topics go off rails in these forums all the time.

1. no -- didn't read the fine print, I guess (so never mind)

2. I don't do "SEO" -- besides, SEO is a misnomer: those people only try to game Google's algorithms (but Google now primarily uses cash instead of algorithms -- the organic results on Google are a lost cause [unless you're an expert at information retrieval -- or maybe people are happy to know that google is actually able to "find" ebay.com when they "search" for ebay... like: woohoo! doesn't google *ROCK*? ;D])

3. I think you should look up what "domain squatting" refers to. AFAIK, it has to do with registering domains of brand names / trademarks (at least that's what it has meant for the past 5 years or so) -- I've linked to an interesting remark made by a Google counsel saying that it's difficult for Google to recognize trademarks (I think it was like 2 years ago when they said that -- LOL!!)

ps: here's the Quote, BTW:

"But Hagan, Google's trademark lawyer, said that software formulas aren't smart enough to identify trademark infringements."

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/04/29/AR2006042900279.html

[AriaStar]

3. I think you should look up what "domain squatting" refers to. AFAIK, it has to do with registering domains of brand names / trademarks (at least that's what it has meant for the past 5 years or so) -- I've linked to an interesting remark made by a Google counsel saying that it's difficult for Google to recognize trademarks (I think it was like 2 years ago when they said that -- LOL!!)

ps: here's the Quote, BTW:

"But Hagan, Google's trademark lawyer, said that software formulas aren't smart enough to identify trademark infringements."

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/04/29/AR2006042900279.html

OMFG, you really have no intention of dropping this, do you. You are a new posted no one here knows anything about, yet you think you are in a position to demand that ****** domains be allowed so you can post yours.

Domain squatting isn't about registering trademarked names, but rather purchasing domains you hope to make money on by reselling at a high mark-up. You're doing nothing with them, have no plans to do something with them, and are just sitting on them until you can find someone willing to pay an inflated fee.

Disallowing ****** isn't going to hurt Rev3. If anything, it helps by cutting down on how much frakking spam is seen around here. This isn't a forum to go off promoting your own business, especially when you're a new person. Yeah, sometimes members who've been around a while can get away with it, but they've established themselves and so have the privilege that comes with that. But if they were to start promoting themselves non-stop, they'd probably be told to stop.

If not being allowed to post one domain here is going to ruin the entire forum for you, then what are you here for? Clearly you were here to post that one domain. Go away.

[TheArchAngel]

OMFG, you really have no intention of dropping this, do you. You are a new posted no one here knows anything about, yet you think you are in a position to demand that ****** domains be allowed so you can post yours.

Domain squatting isn't about registering trademarked names, but rather purchasing domains you hope to make money on by reselling at a high mark-up. You're doing nothing with them, have no plans to do something with them, and are just sitting on them until you can find someone willing to pay an inflated fee.

Disallowing ****** isn't going to hurt Rev3. If anything, it helps by cutting down on how much frakking spam is seen around here. This isn't a forum to go off promoting your own business, especially when you're a new person. Yeah, sometimes members who've been around a while can get away with it, but they've established themselves and so have the privilege that comes with that. But if they were to start promoting themselves non-stop, they'd probably be told to stop.

If not being allowed to post one domain here is going to ruin the entire forum for you, then what are you here for? Clearly you were here to post that one domain. Go away.
Thank You maybe he will listen and if not maybe the "powers that be" will stop it.
Like I said this is a tech forum if you don't like join myspace,com

[online]

Clearly you were here to post that one domain.

What is primarily clear to me from this is that you actually believe in your own delusions.

Your other fantasies are so far removed from reality that they do not even deserve to be commented on.

Hope you have something more meaningful to add in the future.

[tokenuser]

2. I don't do "SEO" -- besides, SEO is a misnomer: those people only try to game Google's algorithms (but Google now primarily uses cash instead of algorithms -- the organic results on Google are a lost cause [unless you're an expert at information retrieval -- or maybe people are happy to know that google is actually able to "find" ebay.com when they "search" for ebay... like: woohoo! doesn't google *ROCK*? ;D])

You don't do SEO? But you list your interests in your profile as Biography:
keyword advertising online marketing domain names domains

I don't care what you call it, but keyword advertising and online marketing is SEO gaming.

Google's search algorithms are still in place. They are the world largest advertising agency (which is where they make the bulk of their revenue), but keyword are still what drives their algorithms and decides which of the ads it is going to pull into the side bar on a search.

[ericjosepi]

What is primarily clear to me from this is that you actually believe in your own delusions.

Your other fantasies are so far removed from reality that they do not even deserve to be commented on.

Hope you have something more meaningful to add in the future.

Bullshit. You have done NOTHING but bitch and moan on this one topic. Why don't you start engaging the rest of the community instead of crying censorship over the fact that your one TLD has been blocked by our rules and policies forbidding spam?

Obviously you are only here to promote whatever the hell it is you are trying to advertise and you expect us to bow to your whims.

Sir, you remind me of the people who have tried to ban Adblock. You have nothing interesting to say and neither do the ads that I do not wish to see. If you had something worthwhile, you would not have lost the respect of everyone reading this topic.

[AriaStar]

What is primarily clear to me from this is that you actually believe in your own delusions.

Your other fantasies are so far removed from reality that they do not even deserve to be commented on.

Hope you have something more meaningful to add in the future.

If "delusional" is stating that your sole purpose for being here is to post domain spam, then yes, I am delusional. Of your 13 posts, one was asking about a feedback section, which you edited, one was to post a ****** domain, and the other 11 posts were to bitch about not being allowed to post that ****** domain. So I guess I am delusional for not realizing you are here to interact with us instead of post domains. :p

Funny, you telling me you hope I post more meaningful things in the future. See, I've been around for a while, and it's not all been bitching about why I couldn't have my way as a newbie. I hope you decide to bugger off. No wait, I hope you keep this up. I'm rather enjoying listening to a spammer try to justify what he's doing. It may help me have more insight into the mind of spammers. You do realize, do you not, that you aren't on my ignore list and that I'm even replying to you because the more I can understand about you people, the better I can stop spam.

btw, I am an e-mail security analyst and deal with spam and phish detection and prevention for a living.

[AriaStar]

I don't care what you call it, but keyword advertising and online marketing is SEO gaming.

Google's search algorithms are still in place. They are the world largest advertising agency (which is where they make the bulk of their revenue), but keyword are still what drives their algorithms and decides which of the ads it is going to pull into the side bar on a search.


keyword advertising online marketing domain names domains

He knows. I'm not sure what to make of what he lists as his homepage though. It's a ****** domain (big surprise), and does nothing but list a bunch of other domains, and it called "NMW's COCK ( Catalog of Online Collaborative Knowledge )" (copied and pasted exactly). I get the feeling he's trying to boost the domain in ratings but people searching for, say, Wikipedia, and that domain getting a hit, then eventually selling the domain for being high enough in ratings. Gaming the system.

He knows what he's doing, and hits here listing his homepage is helping with that.

[AriaStar]

Bullshit. You have done NOTHING but bitch and moan on this one topic. Why don't you start engaging the rest of the community instead of crying censorship over the fact that your one TLD has been blocked by our rules and policies forbidding spam?

Obviously you are only here to promote whatever the hell it is you are trying to advertise and you expect us to bow to your whims.

Sir, you remind me of the people who have tried to ban Adblock. You have nothing interesting to say and neither do the ads that I do not wish to see. If you had something worthwhile, you would not have lost the respect of everyone reading this topic.

The homepage listed in his profile is a ****** that goes to a page listing nothing but legit links, and he calls it COCK and lists it as

"websites,
domain names,
domain name registration,
keywords,
keyword search,
online marketing,
internet advertising,
etc."

He knows exactly what he's doing and I'm only "arguing" with him (there'd be no quotes if he had a change of winning this) because it's interesting to me to have the rare opportunity to actively engage with someone who openly deals with spamming, I mean, "marketing," for a living. Active career-spammers can be hard to get into contact with. His mindset about how what he's doing is actually legit because he sees it as just marketing is interesting. Either he's really delusional (though he claims I'm the delusional one), or he knows he's lying and is probably pathological at this point.

I'd like to write a book one day on the psychology guiding spammers.

[ericjosepi]

I guess this whole thing is moot since we ****** has been uncensored in certain contexts (not my posts apparently ;)) and we get to see that TERRIBLE looking website of his.

Nice to see 8th grade computer courses are paying off. Not to mention that 8th grade maturity level. COCK? Really?

[online]

You don't do SEO? But you list your interests in your profile as

I don't care what you call it, but keyword advertising and online marketing is SEO gaming.

Logically, that doesn't make any sense -- either you *do* care or you *don't* care (you can't have your cake and eat it, too)



Google's search algorithms are still in place.

Ever heard of "miserable failure"? -- please check your facts.

They are the world largest advertising agency

When I said this a couple years ago, people thought I was joking! :D

(which is where they make the bulk of their revenue), but keyword are still what drives their algorithms and decides which of the ads it is going to pull into the side bar on a search.

hmm -- does *their* algorithm also say that all "INFO" is spam? or is this an algorithm you are in the process of patenting? ;D

[online]

[COLOR="Magenta"]If "delusional" is stating that your sole purpose for being here is to post domain spam, then yes, I am delusional. Of your 13 posts, one was asking about a feedback section, which you edited, one was to post a ****** domain, and the other 11 posts were to bitch about not being allowed to post that ****** domain. So I guess I am delusional for not realizing you are here to interact with us instead of post domains. :p

I am merely responding to the nonsense being propagated -- I am not pushing this, just pushing back on the false accusations.

[online]

I guess this whole thing is moot since we ****** has been uncensored in certain contexts (not my posts apparently ;)) and we get to see that TERRIBLE looking website of his.

Nice to see 8th grade computer courses are paying off. Not to mention that 8th grade maturity level. COCK? Really?

yet another off-topic tangent! :O

It would indeed be nice if people could stay somewhat focused: The contest (which I failed to realize was limited to residents of the United States) is about domain names, not websites. The names I put in are not even my best names -- they are just a couple that I have recently registered. They have no websites yet (but if you had "paid attention", you would know that the contest was not about the best websites, but rather about the best domain names [and *planned* websites; but the form had no space for actually entering such data] -- at least that's what it was *originally* [maybe I should go back and check if anything has changed in the meantime])

BTW: I was doing dynamic programming over 20 years ago -- before you were even *born* (LOL)...

[masherscf]

This thread has degenerated into a bit of bickering match.

The redaction of "info" domains is built into the forum software. It is beyond the power of any member or mod to correct. Therefore, This matter should be addressed in private correspondence with the forum administrators who can pass the suggestion along to those who are responsible for coding such things.

Meanwhile, interested parties who are unacquainted should review the forum rules of conduct (http://revision3.com/forum/showpost.php?p=12218&postcount=1). This may help stop an future misunderstandings.

I'm closing this thread now.