Stan Lee to create cartoon featuring Paris Hilton

[kristen_]

http://sdcitybeat.com/cms/story/detail/all_that_is_night/7153/

Paris Hilton revealed in an interview that she's working with former Marvel Comics chairman Stan Lee on a cartoon. She also stated the show is being developed for MTV and there's going to be a superhero version of the heiress in the toon.

E: “What would your superhero name be?”

P: Actually, I’ve created a superhero with Stan Lee, which is [based on] me, and we’re doing a cartoon right now with MTV.”


Edit: Digg comments pretty much cover what I think http://digg.com/television/Legend_Stan_Lee_developing_Paris_Hilton_animated_s eries_for_MTV

[geeksunny]

I remember hearing about this about a year ago, and the idea still hasn't gotten any easier to swallow. Sounds like Striperella part two.

[dolson]

That's so hot.

[denmmurray]

Oh Stan...first it was "Who wants to be a superhero", then it was Stripperella, and now this...

[comhcinc]

who wants to be a superhero was awesome. it was the only show where team work and doing the right thing was rewarded.

stripperella sucked but no one can hit .500

everyone loves batman but what else did bob kane every do?

[rsk_taker]

That's so hot.


haha,

Stan, why are you promoting Paris?

[ariastar]

*sigh*

Mr. Lee, please quit doing this to yourself.

[masherscf]

Someone beat her to it.

http://www.southparkstudios.com/guide/812/

http://www.southparkstudios.com/episodes/103894/?autoplay=false

[ariastar]

Someone beat her to it.

http://www.southparkstudios.com/guide/812/

Whore-off!!

[comhcinc]

*sigh*

Mr. Lee, please quit doing this to yourself.
what is he doing other than making mad cash?

[esophagus]

what is he doing other than making mad cash?
Doing his job really well.

[morningglow]

I love Stan Lee, but I'm staying far, far away from this.

[eddielee]

Anyone remember the 7th portal or the 7th dimension or something like that... it was a web series by Stan Lee where these kids log into a game and become superheroes. Pretty neat stuff.

[neumann]

I remember hearing about this too... I think the concept of a Paris Hilton-TYPE character could be played with quite interesting. Remember what an unpopular character type Tony Stark was? You were supposed to hate him. But when you make it the REAL person, then you get into some grey areas. Not that I'm suggesting Paris is going to become Iron Bitch or something, but I don't know what's going on in Stan's crazy brilliant brain.

That unrelated Disney thing sounds interesting though, and with the direction Disney Animation is going now that Pixar is tinkering with it, there's a very potent meeting of the minds there which could prove to be quite interesting. I'd never caught the straight-to-DVD Stan Lee animations because they didn't catch my eye, but you get Disney involved... (not that I'm saying that's going to happen, but you can hope for snowballs when people like this get together)

See, here's the thing about Stan, the guy's awesome but even he'll say in interviews that he came up with the idea and handed it to people who knew how to run with it, and I think recently, and maybe it's just ME, but I don't feel confident in the people carrying the ball... I don't even know who they are, you know? That's why the Disney idea intrigues me, those guys you can feel confident in. But so much of this is conjecture, we'd just have to wait and see.

Chris

[lavahot]

But Paris Hilton isn't real. She's the most unreal person I've ever seen. There's nothing authentic about her at all. She's a spoiled brat who has no life to speak of. There are no redeeming qualities to her. She's empty, especially when she's "full". She's a cheap product that stupid people enjoy and cannot avoid the compulsion of buying. What she is and what she represents makes me sick. My greatest fear, of the future Idiocracy, will begin with her success as a media whore.

[masherscf]

But Paris Hilton isn't real. She's the most unreal person I've ever seen. There's nothing authentic about her at all. She's a spoiled brat who has no life to speak of. There are no redeeming qualities to her. She's empty, especially when she's "full". She's a cheap product that stupid people enjoy and cannot avoid the compulsion of buying. What she is and what she represents makes me sick. My greatest fear, of the future Idiocracy, will begin with her success as a media whore.

Ok bud, you just tripped my bullshit factor. Do you know Paris personally? Than how do speak with such authority? You have know way to know that she's anything like she's presented in the media. That being said, that presentation is pretty despicable.

BTW, technically speaking, your post violates forum rules.

2. Creating comments about a person or group of people that is racist, threatening, insulting, abusive, etc is not allowed.

[heyseuss]

BTW, technically speaking, your post violates forum rules.
2. Creating comments about a person or group of people that is racist, threatening, insulting, abusive, etc is not allowed.

What's the definition of 'person' in this case ? Also, 'insulting' ?

I don't see how callins Paris Hilton a whore is insulting, it's merely observational astuteness. I guess it does kind of insult actual whores though.


And didn't Mr and Mrs Hilton already create a cartoon featuring Paris Hilton ?

[ariastar]

what is he doing other than making mad cash?

Causing fans to lose respect for him and roll their eyes.

[ariastar]

Ok bud, you just tripped my bullshit factor. Do you know Paris personally? Than how do speak with such authority? You have know way to know that she's anything like she's presented in the media. That being said, that presentation is pretty despicable.

BTW, technically speaking, your post violates forum rules.

Originally Posted by Rules of Conduct
2. Creating comments about a person or group of people that is racist, threatening, insulting, abusive, etc is not allowed.

So stating an opinion based on the way someone CHOOSES to present herself to the public and the media is a violation of forum rules?

Like it or not, she presents herself as a conceited slut. Now she may not be one behind the scenes, but what we have to go on to base our opinions shows her to be a stupid, spoiled whore. I'm not even talking about the "leaked" porn video. Lots of people do that. But her behavior, from the partying to being seen making out quite in depth with different guys in a short time call her fair maiden virtue into question.

She is a rotten brat too. Did you forget her hissy fit over going to jail for repeated drunk-driving offenses and blowing off court appearances? She expected the judge to look the other way. Just a couple weeks in jail and she ended up in the hospital ward with her parents given special privileges to cut in line to see her over others who had been waiting longer for their turn to visit ill jailed relatives. Every fucking person who drives KNOWS it's wrong to drink and drive, yet she did it repeatedly. And have I mentioned she is spoiled and bratty enough to think she should get off scott-free and and rotten enough to think she got a bad deal?

She can't avoid the compulsion of buying, even when the item is a living creature. Did you miss the fuss about a pet store refusing to let her buy a Yorkie puppy when she told them she was on her way to a photo shoot and thought a puppy would look cuter in the pictures than Tinkerbell? Whether or not that's true (and I agree a Yorkie is much cuter than a chihuahua), the fact is she showed a complete lack of concern for the life of the pup and just wanted to drop thousands on a cute little accessory.

If celebrities are going to make the decision, as adults, to put themselves in the public eye and make conscious attempts to be noticed, then they're fair game for criticism, be that criticism positive or negative. If negative criticism can be called insulting, then so be it. They're still fair game.

[diane]

Hold up, I am by no stretch a fan of Paris Hilton, but there are a couple of things I feel compelled to say.

First, for her behavior to me there is one person to blame and that is her mom. She groomed her kids to be media whores. She would take them at the age of 12 and 14, let them get drunk in bars and dance on table tops. And if that is not bad enough, SHE would call the press. She did this throughout their teen years. And then, when they are old enough to make their own decisions and be held responsible, how are they going to behave? Well, probably not as saints.

Second, as for the car issue,well, anyone who has any sense doesn't drive drunk. But looking at statistics, there are a lot of people without sense. And I know people who have been busted for drunk driving 5 times and have not gone to jail, it is actually not that common. Plus, can you imagine if your whole life you are being rewards for acting like a moron (which she is-tv show, shoe line, movie roles, etc) and now you are being called on it? And odds are her lawyer and family probably were telling her she would get off and not go to jail.

Do I condone her behavior, no, of course not. But I do understand it. People are responsible for their lives, but sometimes they have some serious negatives they need to get past before they can truly become better people.

Also, I would like to bring up one other point, and that is persona. There was a rapper who was accused of murder. The evidence was all circumstancal and there were actual witnesses to verify his alibi. But everyone said he had to be guilty because he sang about murder and was an evil gangsta rapper. Eventually everything came out and his name was cleared. Judging people by the role they play in the public is just bad form. I behave very differently at work than I do in real life, so one could assume that actors and those in the press all the time would definitely do so, in hopes of keeping some aspects of their life sacred.

So when I see Paris, I see her the same way I see Snoop, that rapper. They are performers. We need to view it through that lens. What is sad is that she never had a choice on being a performer, that was decided for her by a person who should have had her ability as a parent questioned a long time ago.

[rsk_taker]

Ok bud, you just tripped my bullshit factor. Do you know Paris personally? Than how do speak with such authority? You have know way to know that she's anything like she's presented in the media. That being said, that presentation is pretty despicable.

BTW, technically speaking, your post violates forum rules.


Dude, for a revision3 community member with thousands of posts, this post is a little rediculous.

On the Paris topic:
You ever hear about the little underage porno she made? How about the DUIs...or her movies or her TV shows. All these negative things about here are 150% warranted. It is such a disgusting thing that she gets as much exposure as she does and now Stan Lee wants to give her more...wow

[masherscf]

So stating an opinion based on the way someone CHOOSES to present herself to the public and the media is a violation of forum rules?.

The basis for a personal attack does not excuse it. The rules don't excuse defamatory descriptions by virtue of an assumed of accuracy.

I'd do the same for you.

Dude, for a revision3 community member with thousands of posts, this post is a little rediculous.


A fail to see how these are correlated. I'm merely ridiculous in volume.

[kristen_]

The basis for a personal attack does not excuse it. The rules don't excuse defamatory descriptions by virtue of an assumed of accuracy.

I'd do the same for you.



A fail to see how these are correlated. I'm merely ridiculous in volume.

Wasn't there a thread awhile back called "stop Uwe Boll from making movies". Where were you then? This is a forum about reviews... if you can't say "X sucks" then all we have left is a carebear stare.

[masherscf]

Wasn't there a thread awhile back called "stop Uwe Boll from making movies". Where were you then? This is a forum about reviews... if you can't say "X sucks" then all we have left is a carebear stare.

Has a post been edited or deleted? Has a thread been closed? Has a member been banned?

I was merely stating my technical opinion that a post violated forum rules.

Members in good standing like Lavahot are given a wide latitude to moderate themselves in these matters.

[comhcinc]

Causing fans to lose respect for him and roll their eyes.

what fans? who are you talking about? i have been a fan of stan lee for most of my life. i have not loss any respect nor have i rolled my eyes. i think it is awesome that he has been working since 1941 and continues to. just because he is working with one person you claim not to like, yet seem to know a good deal about, and you are going to lose respect.

well i don't know if you ever claimed to be a fan, but you are not.

Has a post been edited or deleted? Has a thread been closed? Has a member been banned?

I was merely stating my technical opinion that a post violated forum rules.

Members in good standing like Lavahot are given a wide latitude to moderate themselves in these matters.

let me remind you guys that :



8. If you have any questions, concerns, or feel as if you were unjustly punished, please PM the moderator involved. Making a public scene of it not only won't help the situation, but will look very bad on your part, as well...possibly resulting in disciplinary action up to and including a ban.

[esophagus]

Causing fans to lose respect for him and roll their eyes.He's taking advantage of every media outlet he can and making more money than you can imagine. At 85. Working with Paris Hilton means you can't respect him?

And, by the way, shes a media personality. Everything we see her do is something she is doing specifically for the camera. Whether you like those things or not, you don't actually know Paris Hilton.

[lavahot]

In the interest of fairness I shall repost, not edit, my previous post and remove any inaccuracies or spiteful claims.

She's a spoiled brat who has no real life to speak of. There are few, if any, redeeming qualities to her. She's a cheap product that stupid people enjoy and cannot avoid the compulsion of buying. What she is and what she represents makes me sick. My greatest fear, of the future Idiocracy, will begin with her success as a media whore.

[ryudo]

I just lost respect for Stan Lee.

[esophagus]

Edit: That came across as a personal insult, which isn't what I meant. I'll try rewording.

Its just as bad if not worse to dismiss anything relating to Paris Hilton as it is to follow everything she does. Its the same level of obsession, but the former is fairly spiteful.

[rsk_taker]

A fail to see how these are correlated. I'm merely ridiculous in volume.


Ok, I will try to explain so you understand, lol.

A person with 7000+ posts has what we like to call experience. Experience of the forums, how they work, how people communicate. So, it is 'correlated' because it is rediculous how a person as much as a veteran as you, a moderator no less, posts something like your bullshit factor in reference to someone opinionating on Paris Hilton? What? where is the bullshit in the original post? Are we talking about the same Paris Hilton? Then you go on to say how can we say these things about her if we don't know her personally? like some kinda best buddy defence or something from the friends of Michael Vick killing dogs? well ...uhh... because we've her and heard her EVERYWHERE for 4-5 years? Are you serious man? We see how she acts...how she speaks...we know alot of the things she's done and we judge based on those specific things. And calling her a media-whore...I'm not sure that's innacurate either...that's a media-whore not a whore-whore (which I cannot argue she is not from making an underage porno, but that's another topic for another website, heh). How can we judge anything if we can't do that based on our own observations (in this case, millions of observations).

A person posted about how Paris Hilton acts...which really can't be argued as wrong or not entirely accurate seeing how said person has seen Paris Hilton interviewed on TV, on radio, in newspaper, countless talkshows and news reports etc. We also all know of the various incidents Paris has been involved in.

And then you topped it off with a reference of the Rules of Conduct...oh man. And about someone's opinion on Paris Hilton no less...an observed opinion shared by millions. I don't think this was a very hurtful topic bud.

Also, since you said 'technically' isn't saying someone tipped your 'bullshit' factor technically insulting to the poster of this opinion? This isn't moderating dude. relax.

[rsk_taker]

Btw, no one here said they know Paris Hilton

How many of us know Kobe Bryant... we know he cheated on his wife? Can I say he's untustworthy and disloyal? Can I say he's a poor team-player for the incidents with teammates and his coach? Well well...uhh...I haven't talked to him....so...

Anyone know Hitler? I don't...can I say he's a racist asshole? Can I say he's a bad person?


Geeze, what is with these topics

Guy, please move on. Someone had an opinion on Paris Hilton, I've never seen so much crazyness generated from such a commonplace non-issue such as this.

[heyseuss]

Btw, no one here said they know Paris Hilton

How many of us know Kobe Bryant... we know he cheated on his wife? Can I say he's untustworthy and disloyal? Can I say he's a poor team-player for the incidents with teammates and his coach? Well well...uhh...I haven't talked to him....so...

Anyone know Hitler? I don't...can I say he's a racist asshole? Can I say he's a bad person?


Geeze, what is with these topics

Guy, please move on. Someone had an opinion on Paris Hilton, I've never seen so much crazyness generated from such a commonplace non-issue such as this.


He merely mistook the rule he quoted as referring to 'people' or 'persons' of the world, when the rule applies to us here people, addressing each other.

[esophagus]

He merely mistook the rule he quoted as referring to 'people' or 'persons' of the world, when the rule applies to us here people, addressing each other.
You're right, its totally cool of us to make fun of the people who can't respond.

[heyseuss]

You're right, its totally cool of us to make fun of the people who can't respond.

Yeah, like that silly Star Jones.

[ryudo]

If that rule applies to the world on these forums then ban all political topics or any topic discussing anyone who is not a member of the rev3 forums.

[masherscf]

He merely mistook the rule he quoted as referring to 'people' or 'persons' of the world, when the rule applies to us here people, addressing each other.

The rules actually applies to everyone, members or not. For example, it also applies to Revision3 staff who might not be members of the forum.

[ryudo]

Since we can't talk about people now,lets talk about..erm...weather.

[heyseuss]

Since we can't talk about people now,lets talk about..erm...weather.

NO NO Ryudo. If you don't like rain or snow, Mash will call bullshit on your hate for God.

[masherscf]

Ok, I will try to explain so you understand, lol.

A person with 7000+ posts has what we like to call experience..

I wasn't moderating. Just because I'm a moderator doesn't mean everything I say is moderation. I was posting as a member.

If I was moderating, I would have deleted the comment and warned the author in a PM.

BTW, You just wrote a several hundred word to a silly Monty Python comment.

[diane]

Speaking of Star Jones, can we please find a better elevator pitch for the poor guys than "The Totally Rad Show is like the View with men."

As a woman who has been subjected to that show (the gals like it in the gym) I find it a ghastly description of the show. Can we come up with something better. Obviously it needs to reference something that people who have never seen any podcasts before would be able to grasp. I personally think of "a geeky Sickel and Ebert for movies, tv, comics and games" is a better description, but I think you guys can come up with something of so much better. I have faith.

[heyseuss]

Speaking of Star Jones, can we please find a better elevator pitch for the poor guys than "The Totally Rad Show is like the View with men."

Yikes !! I didn't know it was. It's certainly innappropriate.

[diane]

Yikes !! I didn't know it was. It's certainly innappropriate.

I heard them say it twice at Comic Con and I winced each time. The View is really appealing to a much older audience than even my age group and I am in the same age group as the guys. They deserve better, much better.

[heyseuss]

I heard them say it twice and Comic Con

Yikes, yikes !!

[damnedeyez]

Can we come up with something better. Obviously it needs to reference something that people who have never seen any podcasts before would be able to grasp. I personally think of "a geeky Sickel and Ebert for movies, tv, comics and games" is a better description, but I think you guys can come up with something of so much better. I have faith.

TRS: Guys want to have a drink with them, girls want to have a drink off of them.


Or is this the wrong thread? ;>

[diane]

TRS: Guys want to have a drink with them, girls want to off a drink off of them.


Or is this the wrong thread? ;>

Perfect.